The platform
One closed loop, operated for you.
Not a survey tool with a dashboard bolted on — a standard that runs end to end and proves whether it worked.
CSCI 304 — Data Structures
anonymous · n=63| Criterion | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curriculum design | · | · | · | ● | · | 4.1 |
| Delivery & clarity | · | · | ● | · | · | 3.2 |
| Learning environment | · | · | · | · | ● | 4.6 |
| Feedback & assessment | · | · | · | ● | · | 3.9 |
Same instrument · every course · every term
The loop
Four moves, end to end.
One standardised instrument
Curriculum, delivery, environment, feedback — scored the same way across every course, school, and campus. Anonymous to faculty; aggregates only.
Plain-language reading
Faculty get a private coaching note from their own evaluations. Leadership sees institution-wide trends, outliers, and red flags — no dashboard archaeology.
Verifiable plans
A concern auto-creates an owned, time-boxed action plan with an audit trail review bodies can follow.
Proven, not asserted
The next period's data is checked against the plan. Improvement is measured and the plan closes automatically — evidence retained.
Also included
Everything the rollout actually needs.
Operated for you
We provision, brand, and configure your instance. No IT project to run.
SSO + your LMS
Google, Microsoft Entra, SAML. Canvas / Moodle roster sync.
Accreditation evidence
Structured PDF/CSV exports for GTEC·NAB, NUC, and regional bodies.
Multi-campus
One instrument across every campus, school, and programme.
Anonymous by design
No comment ever traces back to an individual student.
Your data, exportable
Full export on request. Clear retention. No lock-in.
Onboarding
Live in about a day.
- Tell us about your institution — size, schools, sign-in, accreditation context.
- We provision and configure — branding, SSO/SAML, periods, data policy.
- Faculty invited, first period opens — rosters synced.
- Insight and accreditation-ready evidence flow from period one.